Reviewers 2013
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Abraham A. (United Kingdom) Adolfsson L. (Sweden) Aik S. (Malaysia) Barton-Hanson N. (United Kingdom) Birkholtz F. (South Africa) Blonna D. (Italy) Bose D. (United Kingdom) Britten S. (United Kingdom) Bruce C. (United Kingdom) Burkhart K. (Germany) Chee Y. H. (Singapore) Chua Y. P. (Malaysia) Davis B. (United Kingdom) de Kiewiet G. (United Kingdom) den Hartog D. (Netherlands) Ekholm C. (Sweden) Eygendaal D. (Netherlands) Fernandes J. (United Kingdom) Foster P. (United Kingdom) Giotakis N. (United Kingdom) Graham K. (United Kingdom) Harris P. C. (Australia) Hollinger B. (Germany) Hosny G. (Egypt) Huang L. (China) Hui J. (Singapore) Jaeger M. (Germany) James L. (United Kingdom) Kapoor B. (United Kingdom) Keenan G. (United Kingdom) Kloen P. (Netherlands) Kraus T. (Austria) Krukhaug I. (Norway) Kumar G. (United Kingdom) Lichtenberg S. (Germany) Lim Andrew (Singapore) Mueller M. (Germany) Nayagam S. (United Kingdom) Olsen B. S. (Denmark) Orlin J. R. (Norway) Plecko M. (Switzerland) Prommersberger K. J. (Germany) Reigstad O. (Norway) Royston S. (United Kingdom) Saldanha K. (United Kingdom) Sharma H. (United Kingdom) Sirikonda S. (United Kingdom) Stamps G. (United Kingdom) Taylor M. (United Kingdom) Thevendran G. (Singapore) Van Glabbeek F. (Belgium) von Laer L. (Switzerland)
منابع مشابه
Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers
The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...
متن کاملارزیابی میزان دقت داوران یکی از مجلات علمی پژوهشی فارسی زبان در تشخیص اصلاحات مورد نیاز یک مقاله علمی ارسالی؛ سال 1389
Background and Objectives: Final corrections on a manuscript sent for publication in a scientific journal are suggested by reviewers. So this qualifies the paper with the least errors for publication. The present study aimed to assess the Persian language peer reviewers' comments on a manuscript sent to an Iranian Scientific Journal (journal of Rafsanjan university of medical sciences), 2010....
متن کاملAcknowledgement of manuscript reviewers
CONTRIBUTING REVIEWERS The editors of the Journal of Biological Engineering thank all our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in volume 5 (2011) and volume 6 (2012).
متن کاملAcknowledgements to reviewers (2013–2014)
The Editor depends heavily on reviewers in forming opinions about papers submitted to Parasite. We are happy to formally thank the following scientists for their help, great effort and effectiveness in improving the quality of manuscripts. Since January 2013, the rejection rate of Parasite has been about 50%; this list includes reviewers who evaluated papers which were not published. For 2013 a...
متن کاملمعیارهای عینی و دهنی داوران در داوری مقالات چاپ و یا رد شده مجله مدیریت سلامت: سال‌های 92-90
Introduction: Peer-review is one of the important pre-publication steps for academic papers. It usually assures the readers about the high-quality reporting of scientific findings. Since objective and subjective criteria used by the reviewers are effective factors on the quality of journal, this study aims to assess these criteria for the accepted and rejected manuscripts of Journal Health Admi...
متن کامل